 |
 |
|
 Dr. med. Mag. theol Ryke Geerd Hamer Maison d`Arrêt de Fleury Mérogis 7 avenue des Peupliers 91705 Sainte Geneviève des Bois
February 18, 2005
To the Cour de Cassation Chambre criminelle - Affaire Dr. med. Ryke Geerd HAMER - 4 Boulevard de Palais 75001 Paris
Esteemed Court:
I have prepared a letter which was to be sent to the Cour de Cassation, but the latest developments have superseded its content. My intention was to inquire when the Cour de Cassation would deliver a decision on the revocation of my sentence (as per the law until March 1, 2005).
Yesterday, I received through a family friend some encouraging feedback from my lawyer, Maitre Martine Luc-Thaler whom I hold in high regard and who prepared an outstanding Memoire Ampliatif:
1. According to the presiding judges presiding at the Cour de Cassation, Dr. Hamer seems to be considered innocent and free from all charges and convictions!
2. Dr. Hamer should not have been arrested in Spain and extradited to France, he should in any case have been released immediately in compliance with the statutes of the Euro Order; and the trial should have been referred, if at all, to the first instance.
3. He should now be discharged from prison at the latest on March 1, three months after the stipulated date – because he is proven innocent! – and with full access to actions of legal recourse against the French authorities. However, since a trial is scheduled before the Cour de Cassation (something extremely rare in France!) on the subject of the correctness of German New Medicine, the verdict, due to legal technical reasons, cannot be delivered now but only after the trial date, and therefore Dr. Hamer cannot be officially released.
4. An official discharge at this time was also said to be impossible because the image and reputation of the French state and the French judicial authorities would be the subject of incredible ridicule and irreparable damage in a mega-scandal – a 70-year-old man with an immense commitment who invested his reputation was detained innocently for six months in France’s most notorious prison. This would be considered an unforgivable humiliation and an unparalleled embarassment! They are now said to be trying everything in order to save the face of the French government and the justice system.
At this point two options are being considered to achieve that goal:
Option 1:
To convince Dr. Hamer to sign a ”release agreement” despite his innocence. But even the judges of the Cour de Cassation would doubt that he would commit such an act of stupitidy. Signing a ”release agreement” would mean that he, although innocent, would acknowledge his guilt and that his 6-month confinement in France’s worst prison was legally justified. However, the judges of the Cour de Cassation would understand perfectly well that an innocent man would not sign such a paper, not to mention the other conditions imposed on him:
A bail of €150,000
Weekly reports to the police station (for 7 years)
No permission to leave France for 7 years
No permission to discuss German New Medicine with anyone ever
Option 2:
It seems that the Cour de Cassation has already considered or even decided upon requesting a date for an oral trial before the Cour de Cassation, filing a motion to hear evidence on the correctness of German New Medicine. This would clearly confirm and emphasize the meaning of such a motion, since oral trials before the Cour de Cassation are quite the exception. In this case Dr. Hamer would be able to address the court personally and to present his evidence on the correctness of German New Medicine.
The problem:
For legal technical reasons I would have to officially remain in prison for another month or two – despite my innocence – until the date of the oral trial before the Cour de Cassation. The sole purpose of this trail is to file a motion to hear evidence. With or without this motion, I am still innocent.
Now that would really be the proverbial cherry on the cake: an innocent 70-year-old detained in France’s most awful prison for a few months more so that the French government can save its face.
And furthermore, as a weary and battle-seasoned fox, I am, of course, very suspicious to be offered such an unexpected gift by my enemies. In allusion to the Aeneid and Cassandra’s words when she saw the Trojan Horse enter the city, let me say: "Quidquid it est, timeo Gallios, et dona ferentes" (whatever it may be – the Trojan Horse – I fear the Gallic, even if they bring me gifts).
Therefore it would be necessary to create a minimum level of trust in a preliminary discussion to reassure me that the Trojan Horse does not contain any weapons, that it is not a trap but a legitimate way of finding out whether and if German New Medicine is really correct. May the Cour de Cassation hold in my favor that my experience with the hateful judges of Chambéry and the equally hateful officials working at the French Ministry of Justice is a sad one (having been branded a criminal and punished by 3 years of prison out of pure hatred although I was innocent).
I am, however, firmly convinced that most of the judges at the Cour de Cassation have known for a long time that German New Medicine is correct.
For twenty years?!
Esteemed Court:
I basically fully agree with the Cour de Cassation’s obviously positive decision to schedule an oral trial for a hearing on the correctness of German New Medicine – I have been waiting for this for 24 years!
The modalities remain to be discussed further.
I also realize that the trial date must be scheduled as part of the overall proceedings at the Cour the Cassation and that technical reasons would necessitate an official extension of my detention - despite my innocence – until a date is fixed.
Therefore I offer the utmost support and cooperation in making this trial possible. It is my express wish to have this oral trial happen because I have been trying to achieve exactly that for 24 years. I therefore wholeheartedly embrace the decision made by the Cour de Cassation.
I herewith ask the Cour de Cassation to:
1. Establish a date for the oral tiral.
2. Let me know – through my lawyer Maitre Martine Luc-Thaler or personally – when I might leave this jail ”on my word of honour” so that I can prepare myself for the trial. I need 3 to 4 weeks and I cannot do this in a prison cell.
3. Accept a bail payment of €20,000 (from an innocent person) and to accept my offer of voluntarily returning to prison a few days before the trial date.
The scandalous proceedings at Chambéry cannot be undone, that much is certain, just as the legal scandal which occurred in November 1991 in Paris where proceedings against, or rather in favor of the murderer of my son Dirk took place, cannot be undone.
But if this means that I – as an innocent! – had to spend 6 months in France’s most awful jail with the result that our patients will as of now no longer be forced to die from chemotherapy or morphine, then it was my pleasure to spend this time in prison because I endured it for my patients. Then this inhuman and terrible arrest would make sense.
I therefore request a trial date for the end of March and my preliminary release from prison to prepare myself for the proceedings (on an innocent’s word of honour). Respectfully submitted,
Dr. HAMER
P.S.
I hope that I was able to correctly reiterate the information on hand. Please correct me if I made errors or omissions.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
