|
My story of Testicular Cancer
In January 2002, I discovered a hardening in my right testicle. It was quite swollen and enlarged, yet I had no pain. I decided to see an urologist, because I had read in a self-diagnosis handbook that this could be testicular cancer. That realization scared me a great deal, because of the association of cancer = death, and Chemo /radiation = poison.
The next morning, I suddenly remembered that I had read something on the Internet regarding cancer and alternatives to chemotherapy. What I learned about "New Medicine" and Dr. Hamer soon convinced me – particularly when I read that testicular cancer always relates to a “profound loss conflict”.
Exactly this type of conflict had reached its peak for me six months earlier, in the summer of 2001. As Dr. Hamer formulates in the "Iron Rule of Cancer", my conflict had indeed been "highly dramatic and isolating“, because, at that particular time, I really could not talk to anybody about what had happened. Thankfully, by October 2001, I was finally able to see my way clear of this major life crisis.
All my fear was blown away. That’s why I decided not to consult an urologist right away, but rather to seek the advice of a doctor who was conversant with German New Medicine. Through a GNM Study Group I found a physician who had been involved with GNM for a short time. We discussed the conflict and the resolution that was already underway. The evaluation of my brain CT scans confirmed that the conflict had been resolved. The diagnosis was: ”interstitial testicular carcinoma (necrosis) in remission”, i.e. the healing phase was already in progress.
Dr. Hamer describes the development of such a cancer as follows: with interstitial testicular carcinoma, a cell-minus (necrosis) occurs in the conflict active phase, but it remains largely unnoticed. In the healing phase, i.e. following the resolution of the conflict, the testicular cell necrosis is refilled and replenished with new cells, accompanied with swelling. Eventually, there will be the formation of a testicular cyst. The purpose of the Special Biological Program lies at the end of the healing phase, when the indurated testicle is able to produce considerably more male sexual hormone (testosterone) and, this way, stimulate the ability and willingness to ‘reproduce’ on the part of the male to replace the loss of the child or partner.
I felt very relieved, particularly by the fact that the swelling of the testicle was a sign of healing.
In March 2002, I arranged with my doctor to have an additional urological examination. Because I did not have any discomfort, I postponed the visit to the urologist for some time. The swelling of the upper one-third of the testicle had not increased in any way – on the contrary, the testicle did no longer feel nearly so full and swollen as before.
In mid-April, I started to feel slight pulling pains in my right testicle. The next day, they became so severe that I started to fear that this could have something to do with the tumor. My temperature was slightly elevated, and I was overwhelmed by feelings of apprehension and anxiety. A lot of thoughts went through my mind. Could Dr. Hamer be wrong, after all? Could it be that his method is not working for me?
I reacted by immediately going for the consultation with the urologist. The palpation test and the ultrasound revealed with 95% certainty that I had testicular cancer. He strongly advised me to proceed as quickly as possible with an operation and, depending on the analysis (optical and pathological), to have the testicle extirpated. In 90% of all cases, this would result in the precautionary removal of the testicle. Almost 100% of cases are followed by further operations, such as removal of lymph nodes in the abdominal region, Chemo and/or radiation. If I did nothing at all, I was told, this would mean certain death within two years.
That diagnosis was at first a huge shock for me. Although I had been prepared for it, the fear of cancer and death overtook me once again. The fact that the tests showed the tumor markers to be negative calmed me a little. I also knew that there could be cancer cases with negative markers.
But within a day, the pains were gone. Once again, I searched for alternative solutions. Finally, I did decide to proceed according to German New Medicine – and to keep my testicle. Nevertheless, from time to time, renewed doubts whether GNM was the correct therapy would resurface. I continued to seek information on various Internet sources. Apart from that, I consulted another GNM physician who gave me an independent diagnosis that corresponded 100% with the first one.
In May, we did a new brain CT-scan. The analysis showed that healing had advanced even further. The target-rings of the Hamer Focus (HH) were already partially scarred over.
In June, I once again consulted my urologist. I was anticipating reproaches from him as I had not followed his advice, but he only asked me whether I felt better. When I told him that I felt fine, that the induration had receded to a large degree, and that there was no longer any swelling, he examined me at once. He attested to the fact that the induration was only noticeable on the apex of the testicle (epidydimis), probably as indurated (hardened) tissue. He said that such a development is unusual and that he would be inclined to take back his last diagnosis. Not that he had any explanation for this result. However, he advised me to wait for a while and keep a watchful eye over the developments. The fact that the markers were inconspicuous finally convinced me to trust GNM and Dr. Hamer completely.
At the beginning of September, I went for a final check-up with the urologist. The palpation and ultrasound showed that there had been no large changes in the testicle. The remaining hardening of the epidydimis had grown only minimally (from 15mm to 17mm), but he was not sure about the consistency of the tissue and - in contrast to his last findings - suspected that this could be a cyst.
Now it seems that the cyst anticipated by Dr. Hamer was becoming a reality. In November, we will do some final examinations to be able to further observe the course of the healing phase.
I thank God that He saved me from surgery, radiation, and Chemo – that there is a Dr. Hamer. I am certain that I would otherwise have lost my testicle - not to mention the suffering and the damages that the operation(s), Chemo, and radiation would have caused.
Christoph Buck
November 2002
From: http://www.pilhar.com/Hamer/NeuMed/Erfarung/Hodenkrebs.htm
| 
